How can Govt spend public fund for Projecting its achievements, How Protocol of PM can be ignored in Govt advertisements?

UPA Govt. is spending Rs 180 crores from the tax payers money for projecting their achievements. see the link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpbT76w_zm0

This is another violation committed by this countries worst ever PM  and his team . If any work is done by this govt , what is to  be proud of it ( are they are not doing their simple duty ? ). All projects done by utilizing public money and the govt. is elected to do this. When this govt failed to perform even below than average they wants to cover up this bad governance by   utilizing public fund. It is double harassment to the public . when govt fails to perform they wants to cover up their mistakes by putting advertisements from poor mans hard earned money . This kind of atrocities are unquestioned by any body including  the opposition parties.

Another important and most astonishing fact in the Advertisement is that   UPA chairpersons photo figures in front of the elected Prime Minister. This is clear violation of Protocol . At least P.M should understand that he is de-jure Prime Minister  though he is not the de-facto P.M. When he know his limitations how can he makes a complaint to the privilege committee!, very sad things of affair. I never find such kind of state of affairs in any dispensation . How can UPA chairperson take credit of the projects implemented under the decision of cabinet in which she is not a member? Law, procedure, Constitution, Protocol nothing prevents these people from doing these kind of naked violations.

I Hope for a system in which this kind of expenses should directed to be  refunded by the those  who are done this wastage. Tax payer's money should be spend only for running r the govt and for the public benefit and not for any advertisements. Can anybody bring that kind of system in this Country ? I am waiting for a total national reform Movement to bring that kind of dispensation in which money spend for non public purposes should be directed to be refunded to public exchequer, or else the violators should be put behind the bars. 

IPL Match Fixing Story- A tale well drafted to fool our countryman

Indian Cricket premier league is totally a private event controlled and managed by the Private individuals and bodies. No public money is involved or the government has any control over the functioning over the IPL. The Delhi police had recently arrested few cricketers on the ground that they are part of match fixing racket. Interestingly before such arrest nothing heard about any complaint made in the matter. Since the alleged crime is not against the public at large a criminal complaint is the main starting point for taking any such investigation in to match fixing in IPL. The Delhi police arrested few guys all print and visual medias quickly started highlighting the story relating to match fixing and the involvement of various other people . Before doing this kind of wide coverage are they inquired as to the maintainability of a case against the cricketers for mach fixing when no affected party made a complaint ? 

The important section invoked by the police against the cricketers is section 420 cheating . The sections says that ;

Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.-- Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Of fraudulent deeds and dispositions of property;

So in this mach fixing case who is being cheated ? 

Answer will be the people who invested money in betting. various states in India are specifically banned betting and gambling . Then how can the legal violators came before the police and register a complaint ? 

So not single aggrieved party is not going to make a complaint against the mach fixers. That means finally the arrested cricketers will be freed by the police . This is not the first mach fixing case in India . In the past also such scams were Brock out and the police failed to do any thing against the mach fixers. In the back ground of this event Union Law minster expressed the possibility of bringing new law to deal with this problem, whatever it may be but at the present moment Police did not have any power or authority to arrest the cricketers. But they are doing it and the medias are giving big coverage to this incident with every hour breaking news. 

We are fooled by medias and police . realize and ignore the stories of IPL mach fixing. There аре  big events happening in this country including the police atrocities and resistance from the public . This very same Delhi police failed to nab the culprits involved in 1984 sick riots. The victims are still fighting for justice. If medias are not correcting their ways public should respond.   

What is this secular face which JDU talking about

In the last parliament election JDU did not find any problem in supporting L.K. Adwani as the Prime Minster candidates for NDA. Remember Adwani was the main force behind the Ram Janboomi issue and also supported the demolition of Babri Masjid Openly.  The demolition of Babri Masjid resulted into massive communal violencess   across the country and hundreds of innocent people lost their life. This history of communal face of L.K. was not a problem to the JDU either during Vajpai Regime or later when they decided to back L.K. as P.M. Candidate. 
Hence the recent resolution of JDU indirectly asking the BJP not project as Modi P.M. Candidate because of his non secular face seems to be not very much convincing. It seems that JDU is having some hidden agenda behind this resolution. It is for them to come out of the Front if they did not like Modi as P.M. Candidates. No party can dare to  make such kind of resolution if they wants to be part of a front. It seems that this resolution had backing from  some BJP leaderships who really wants to keep Modi out of central leaderships. Obvious reason such move is not a secret at present. It is now more and more clear is that Majority of BJP leaderships will try to prevent Modi to be named as P.M. Candidate.As par us secular face is concerned it seems that the term is more and more vague in this country. In reality it will be very difficult to find out a non communal leader in the country as most of the leaders are shown their communal face . Barring few leaders majority are either communal or castiests. Can any body says that Mulayam Singh and Mayawathi are secular ? No, they are not secular at all; they are talking about separate section of the people. when ever they are in power they tried to give benefit to particular communities . Even Nitish Kumar who claims to be  representing a particular community is not secular. Either cast or religion leaders are  always interested in vote banks. Such kind of leaders can't be secular any more which every body should understand. Don't use this word only with an intention to prevent a particular person ? If JDU wants secular person in the top post you should not have supported L.K. Adwani. So stop this nonsense at the moment and come out with clear evidence.      

Need to re frame principle in the matter of death sentence.

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed death row convict and Khalistani terrorist Devinderpal Singh Bhullar's plea for commutation of his death sentence, a ruling that can have an impact on 17 other convicts, including those held guilty in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination, facing execution.

Delivering the operative portion of the judgement in a packed room, a Bench of justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya said that the petitioners for Bhullar failed to make out a case for commutation of sentence.

"The petitioner has failed to make out a case for commutation of death sentence to life imprisonment on grounds of delay," said the Supreme Court.,,,

This judgment clearly shattered the hope of many  of the death convicts who are languishing in Indian jails  for more than one or two decades. Though I have some professional interests in the matters pending before the Hon'ble Supreme court, as I am the counsel on record for the convicts of Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, this opinion is not influenced by that professional interests. 

We can see that human nature behavioral, approach, attitude , thinking, presumptions and relation ships are not always statics in any ones life. Each individual gets changed in different circumstances. We can say some bodies lifes births and deaths takes place several times. A person who is very fundamentalist yesterday get transformed into another form of philosophy today because of some other circumstances. Due to this kind of basic principles no body can assure that any body will live with any one of basic principles or philosophies in his entire life span . So transformation is possible in every bodies life. 

Due to this reason the Supreme court of Our Country has formulated a legal principle in the matters  of death penalty and basic grounds for such principle is that death penalty can be awarded in rarest of rare cases. The cases in which death  penalties were given by the highest courts of the land are very clearly distinguishable from the general cases . The elements of  in- human nature of the accused were highlighted by the Apex courts in those judgments. This kind of inhuman nature makes the accused a non suitor to live in a cultured society. There was no other principles discernible from  the  decided cases. The present question thus arises from the changed circumstances that is as to whether  in view of the lapse of long period in between the actual commission of offence and the final confirmation of the death penalty accused will remain  non suitor to live in a cultured society? 

It revealed that  the transformation taken place in various accused's life during their period of incarceration.  If a first hand study is conducted it can be proved that the accused in several cases changed their views and prescriptions about their life. They are really hoping for a chance to get another life. There are such examples in the past also where the death convicts, who got relaxation in their sentence,  leading a peaceful and clam life. One  notorious criminal who escaped from death penalty is now working as security guard in Kerala. Why not such a chance is is given to the various accused who are already suffered life term of their sentence in Jail . I think judges of our  country should try to realize the transformation path of a human life. No political consideration  should  be a guiding principle in the matter of death sentence. If you are not having the power to give life to any body don't take it. that is all. ( Thamasoma Jyotir Gamaya )